Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 07:35
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Why do we exist, and why are we conscious?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Why is every human messed up in some way?
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What do you think about me (Aditya Krishna)?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Australia's Qantas to close budget airline Jetstar Asia - BBC
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Minecraft's "Vibrant Visuals" update finally has a release date - Eurogamer
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.